• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Related Links
    • FAQ
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
    • Journal Forms
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Mining and Environment
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Nikkhah, M., Ghasvareh, M., Farzaneh Bahalgardi, N. (2019). Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making. Journal of Mining and Environment, 10(3), 597-611. doi: 10.22044/jme.2019.7136.1559
M. Nikkhah; M. A. Ghasvareh; N. Farzaneh Bahalgardi. "Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making". Journal of Mining and Environment, 10, 3, 2019, 597-611. doi: 10.22044/jme.2019.7136.1559
Nikkhah, M., Ghasvareh, M., Farzaneh Bahalgardi, N. (2019). 'Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making', Journal of Mining and Environment, 10(3), pp. 597-611. doi: 10.22044/jme.2019.7136.1559
Nikkhah, M., Ghasvareh, M., Farzaneh Bahalgardi, N. Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making. Journal of Mining and Environment, 2019; 10(3): 597-611. doi: 10.22044/jme.2019.7136.1559

Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making

Article 3, Volume 10, Issue 3, Summer 2019, Page 597-611  XML PDF (1.37 MB)
Document Type: Case Study
DOI: 10.22044/jme.2019.7136.1559
Authors
M. Nikkhah email 1; M. A. Ghasvareh1; N. Farzaneh Bahalgardi2
1Faculty of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
2Faculty of Computer Engineering, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
In general, underground spaces are associated with high risks because of their high uncertainty in geotechnical environments. Since most accidents and incidents in these structures are often associated with uncertainty, the development of risk analysis and management methods and prevention of accidents are essential. A deeper recognition of the factors affecting the implementation process can pave the way for this purpose. Risk rating of projects is a key part of the risk assessment stage in the risk management process of each project. Various multi-criteria decision-making methods, as quantitative approaches, are used to allow them to be used in the risk rating issue of each project. In this work, a new model is provided for risk management of Mashhad Urban Railway Line 3 using the game theory and multi-criteria decision-making methods. Based on the answers of the specialists and experts to the prepared questionnaires, various risk groups identified using the TOPSIS and AHP multi-criteria decision-making methods are ranked. Accordingly, the group of economic risks, as the most important risk and social risk group, is ranked as the least significant in both methods. In the following, the appropriate response to the main risks of the ratings is proposed based on the modeling of the game theory, and ranked in terms of importance. Also the worst risk scenario in the project is identified, and the appropriate responses for this state are also expressed in order of importance. The results obtained indicate that the risk of financing problems is the most significant risk, and other risks are ranked in terms of importance in the next ranks. Additionally, the use of new financing methods at times of credit scarcity and project financial problems is also considered as the most important response to the risk in this project.
Keywords
Risk; Multi-Criteria Decision Macking; Game Theory; AHP; TOPSIS
Main Subjects
Rock Mechanics
Statistics
Article View: 187
PDF Download: 237
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top


free web tracker

 Creative Commons License

JME is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal Management System. Designed by sinaweb.